UFRTI Campaign-AP
Saturday, 6 December 2025
UFRTI-AP and HRF demand that the Google MOU be placed in the public domain. Public resources = public right to know.
Press Release
The Human Rights Forum (HRF)
and the United Forum for RTI Campaign (UFRTI) express deep concern over the Andhra
Pradesh government’s refusal to disclose the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)
signed with Google for the proposed Data Center and allied investments in
Visakhapatnam and Anakapalli districts. We demand that the MoU be made public
without further delay.
The State government has
been projecting the agreement as a landmark investment and ‘game-changer’ with
far reaching economic benefits and that it will position the State as a digital
infrastructure hub. However, the government has refused to make the contents of
the MOU available in the public domain. Its continued opacity in the matter
clearly violates the basic principles of the Right to Information Act, 2005. Citizens
possess the right to know the precise nature of the commitments, concessions
and safeguards contained in this MOU, especially given its potential impact on
water, energy use, land and data governance in the State. When agreements of
such magnitude, the Google Data Center is said to involve an investment of 15
billion dollars, are signed in secrecy, it erodes public trust and undermines
democratic oversight.
Under Section 4 of the
Right to Information Act, 2005, the government is legally obligated to
proactively disclose information relating to all public agreements,
concessions, land allotment and long-term commitments without requiring
citizens to file RTI requests. These documents should have been placed in the
public domain voluntarily. Despite this statutory obligation, a formal RTI
application seeking access to the MoU was rejected recently by the Government
of AP citing confidentiality. This refusal not only violates the letter and
spirit of the RTI Act but also raises serious concerns about the government’s
commitment to transparency in matters related to critical public resources.
This lack of disclosure is
deeply troubling. A project of this scale involves significant commitment of
public resources including power, water, land and subsidies and incentives of
various kinds. HRF and UFRTI believe such allocations must be subject to public
scrutiny. It is widely acknowledged that such large data centers will exert
significant pressure on the State’s already stressed power and water infrastructure.
Without access to the MOU, how are civil society organisations, concerned
citizens and researchers to assess whether adequate environmental safeguards,
social impact assessments, data localisation safeguards, privacy protections,
requisite oversight mechanisms and data privacy frameworks have been built into
the agreement?
In keeping with the statutory
mandate under Section 4 of the RTI Act we urge that all documents pertaining to
the Google Data Center MoU - including the MoU itself, its annexures, details
of land and infrastructure commitments, fiscal concessions and related
correspondence - be made available online, in full and without delay. Citizens
must not be compelled to apply, appeal or litigate for information that the law
explicitly identifies for suo motu disclosure.
The government’s
unwillingness to disclose information reflects a broader and shameful weakening
of the State’s institutional mechanisms of openness and accountability. Five
out of the eight positions in the AP State Information Commission, including that
of the Chief Information Commissioner, remain vacant. As a result, the
Commission is unable to function with its full mandate, hear appeals, enforce
orders or ensure compliance under the RTI Act. A similar impasse in the past necessitated
the intervention of the Supreme Court to restore appointments and the
Commission’s functioning. The recurrence of such vacancies now raises grave concerns
about the State’s commitment to sustaining an effective and independent
transparency regime.
We demand that the Chief
Information Commissioner be appointed and all vacancies in the Information
Commission be filled without further delay. The State government must demonstrate
its commitment to transparent governance through action, not rhetoric. A State
that claims to drive technological innovation and progress cannot resort to
secrecy, it must embody transparency. Decisions taken in the name of the public
must be open to public scrutiny.
The Government of AP
must immediately upload all documents relating to the MoU with Google Data on
an official public platform.
VS Krishna – HRF AP&TG Coordination Committee
member
Chakradhar Buddha -
Co-Convenor, United Forum for RTI Campaign-AP
6-12-2025
Visakhapatnam
Saturday, 13 September 2025
Copy of letter writtent by UFRTI Campaign Andhra Pradesh to Hon'Ble Governor, Andhra Pradesh
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hfflHwcyaDXx-8YR4H8ar8tJs2J3ONJf/view?usp=drive_link
Monday, 7 October 2024
Report on the Functioning of the AP Information Commission Submitted to the Governor
Report on the Functioning of the AP Information Commission Submitted to the Governor
The State Chief Information Commissioner (SCIC) has submitted a detailed report to the Governor on the functioning of the Andhra Pradesh Information Commission (APIC). You can access the full report through the link below.
It is important to note that APIC commissioners are currently refusing to sign the attendance register. This refusal stems from an order passed by the SCIC, which requires commissioners to comply with attendance rules. The SCIC has also halted the salaries of commissioners who have failed to comply, resulting in an impasse.
In light of this situation, the SCIC has submitted the report to the Governor, outlining the ongoing issues and the steps being taken to ensure accountability and efficiency within the commission.
[Access the Report Here]
Wednesday, 2 October 2024
Urgent Call for Accountability: United Forum for RTI Appeals to APIC for Improved Functioning
Dear Chief Commissioner and Commissioners,
We hope this email
finds you well. Please find attached a formal letter from the United
Forum for RTI Campaign-AP, raising critical concerns about the current
functioning of the Andhra Pradesh Information Commission (APIC).
The
letter highlights urgent issues, including non-compliance with
attendance protocols, the growing backlog of RTI cases. We are also
requesting a public meeting with RTI activists on the occasion of RTI
Day (12th October 2024), either in person or online, to foster dialogue
and explore potential improvements.
We kindly request your immediate attention to these matters to ensure the Commission’s efficient functioning and public trust.
Looking forward to your response.
Sincerely,
Chakradhar Budda & Emmanuel Dasari
State Co-Conveners, United Forum for RTI Campaign - AP




